000			03325cam a2200421 i 4500
001			17194828
003			OSt
005			20231122151415.0
008			120305s2012 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2012008280
020			_a9781107017078 (hardback)
040			_aODPP _bODPP _cODPP
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aKZ6376 _b.L37 2012
082	0	0	_a341.5/84 _223
084			_aPOL035010 _2bisacsh
100	1		_aLarsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, _d1976-
245	1	4	_aThe human rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / _cKjetil Mujezinović Larsen.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_axlii, 473 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law
500			_aRevised version of the author's thesis (Ph. D., University of Oslo, 2010).
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 439-460) and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction and overview; 2. The emerging relevance of human rights law in UN-mandated peace operations; 3. The other side of the coin: the alleged inappropriateness of applying human rights treaties in UN-mandated peace operations; 4. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae; 5. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci; 6. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts; 7. Derogations; 8. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties; 9. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states; 10. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions; 11. Conclusions.
520			_a"Do States, through their military forces, have legal obligations under human rights treaties towards the local civilian population during UN-mandated peace operations? It is frequently claimed that it is unrealistic to require compliance with human rights treaties in peace operations and this has led to an unwillingness to hold States accountable for human rights violations. In this book, Kjetil Larsen criticises this position by addressing the arguments against the applicability of human rights treaties and demonstrating that compliance with the treaties is unrealistic only if one takes an 'all or nothing' approach to them. He outlines a coherent and more flexible approach which distinguishes clearly between positive and negative obligations and makes treaty compliance more realistic. His proposals for the application of human rights treaties would also strengthen the legal framework for human rights protection in peace operations without posing any unrealistic obligations on the military forces"-- _cProvided by publisher.
610	2	0	_aUnited Nations _xPeacekeeping forces.
650		0	_aHuman rights monitoring.
650		0	_aTreaties.
650		0	_aPeacekeeping forces _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aConflict management.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Human Rights. _2bisacsh
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK _n0
999			_c465 _d465