000			02897cam a2200253 a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230925130854.0
008			110428s2012 enka b 001 0 eng
020			_a9780521138369 (paperback)
040			_aODPP _cODPP _dODPP _bEng
050	0	0	_aK5210 _b.C66 2012
245	0	4	_aThe content and context of hate speech : _brethinking regulation and responses / _cedited by Michael Herz, Peter Molnar.
260			_aCambridge ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_axxiv, 544 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aInterview with Robert Post -- Is there a case for banning hate speech? -- Hate speech -- Interview with Kenan Malik -- Hate speech and the demos -- On American hate speech law -- Social epistemology, holocaust denial, and the post-millian calculus -- Denying experience : holocaust denial and the free speech theory of the state -- What's wrong with defamation of religion? -- Responding to "hate speech" with art, education, and the imminent danger test -- Reconceptualizing counterspeech in hate-speech policy (with a focus on Australia) -- Hate speech and self-restraint -- Hate speech in constitutional jurisprudence : a comparative analysis -- One step beyond hate speech : post-soviet regulation of "extremist" and "terrorist" and "terrorist" speech in the media -- Hate speech and comprehensive forms of life -- Hate speech and political legitimacy -- Reply to Jeremy Waldron -- Waldron, Machiavelli, and hate speech -- Shielding marginalized groups from verbal assaults without abusing hate speech laws -- Interview with Nadine Strossen -- Interview with Theodore Shaw -- Does international law provide for consistent rules on hate speech? -- State-sanctioned incitement to genocide : the responsibility to prevent -- A survey and critical analysis of council of Europe strategies for countering "Hate speech" -- The American convention on human rights : regulation of hate speech and similar expression -- Orbiting hate : satellite transponders and free expression.
520			_a"The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories, and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical setting justify different substntive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aHate speech.
650		0	_aFreedom of speech.
650		7	_aLAW / General _2bisacsh.
700	1		_aHerz, Michael E.
700	1		_aMolnár, Péter, _d1964-
942			_2lcc _cBK _kK5210 _m. C66 2012
999			_c194 _d194